Seat Exeo 2012 vs SAAB 9-5 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Seat Exeo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Exeo engine produces 50 HP more power than SAAB 9-5, whereas torque is 40 NM more than SAAB 9-5. Thanks to more power Seat Exeo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 10.6 | |
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Exeo consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Seat Exeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
Seat Exeo is smaller. Seat Exeo is 17 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 416 litres | |
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Exeo has 26 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-5. The SAAB 9-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6200 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |