Seat Exeo 2012 vs SAAB 9-5 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.9 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 - 210 HP | 150 - 260 HP | |
Torque: | 230 - 350 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 11.1 seconds | 7.3 - 12.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 7.7 | 6.7 - 10.6 | |
Seat Exeo petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-5. On average, Seat Exeo equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
Seat Exeo is smaller. Seat Exeo is 17 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 416 litres | |
Seat Exeo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Exeo has 26 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-5. The SAAB 9-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Exeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`051 | ~ 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6200 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Exeo has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |