Seat Cordoba 2000 vs Ford Puma 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive. Seat Cordoba engine produces 31 HP more power than Ford Puma, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Ford Puma. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.4 | |
|
The Ford Puma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.34 m | |
| Seat Cordoba is 18 cm longer than the Ford Puma, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Ford Puma has
| |