Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Seat Toledo 1999

 
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Seat Toledo
1999 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP90 HP
Torque: 210 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds13 seconds
Seat Cordoba and Seat Toledo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.2 l/100km5.7 l/100km
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1300 km on highway
860 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption
Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.44 m
Width: 1.64 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller.
Seat Cordoba is 28 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`400
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Seat Toledo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably better
Average price (€): 10001400
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Seat Toledo has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv