Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Peugeot 306 1999

 
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Peugeot 306
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP90 HP
Torque: 210 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds13 seconds
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Cordoba and Peugeot 306 have the same engine power, but Seat Cordoba torque is 5 NM more than Peugeot 306. Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.2
Real fuel consumption: 5.2 l/100km5.8 l/100km
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle1150 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1390 km on highway
860 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption
Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.27 m
Width: 1.64 m1.69 m
Height: 1.42 m1.38 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher.
Seat Cordoba is 11 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data463 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`635
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Seat Cordoba has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 1000800
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Peugeot 306 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv