Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Ford Mondeo 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 133 NM | 330 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 62 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 197 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.8 | |
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Cordoba consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 56 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.16 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Seat Cordoba is smaller. Seat Cordoba is 57 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Ford Mondeo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Ford Mondeo quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |