Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Ford Mondeo 2000

 
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Ford Mondeo
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP110 HP
Torque: 145 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds11.6 seconds
Seat Cordoba engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Despite less power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.87.7
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km8.1 l/100km
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 570 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
750 km on highway1050 km on highway
530 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.73 m
Width: 1.64 m1.81 m
Height: 1.42 m1.43 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller.
Seat Cordoba is 57 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data500 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`865
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Ford Mondeo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Cordoba, so Ford Mondeo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Ford Mondeo has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv