Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Ford Focus 2001

 
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Ford Focus
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP100 HP
Torque: 116 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.9 seconds11 seconds
Ford Focus is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 40 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Ford Focus. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway1010 km on highway
630 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.16 m4.38 m
Width: 1.64 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.43 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller.
Seat Cordoba is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data490 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 8001`615
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Ford Focus has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford Focus, so Ford Focus quality is probably better
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • lower fuel consumption
Ford Focus has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv