Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Ford Focus 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Ford Focus is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 40 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Ford Focus. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
830 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.16 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Seat Cordoba is smaller. Seat Cordoba is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 490 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`615 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Ford Focus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford Focus, so Ford Focus quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Ford Focus has
| |