Seat Cordoba 2003 vs Ford Focus 2001

 
Seat Cordoba
2003 - 2006
Ford Focus
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP100 HP
Torque: 126 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds11 seconds
Ford Focus is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Cordoba and Ford Focus have the same engine power, but Seat Cordoba torque is 19 NM less than Ford Focus. Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.8
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Ford Focus is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway1010 km on highway
530 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.38 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Seat Cordoba is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data490 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Focus.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`615
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons:
    Ford Focus has
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv