Seat Cordoba 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 1995

 
Seat Cordoba
1998 - 1999
Volkswagen Polo
1995 - 1999
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP64 HP
Torque: 235 NM124 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds15.8 seconds
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 46 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 111 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.05.6
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Cordoba consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Seat Cordoba over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway1020 km on highway
Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m3.72 m
Width: 1.64 m1.66 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Seat Cordoba is 42 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data975 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`435
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800800
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volkswagen Polo has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv