Seat Cordoba 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 140 NM | 128 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive. Seat Cordoba engine produces 25 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
530 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
Seat Cordoba is 42 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 245 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 975 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 800 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |