Seat Cordoba 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994

 
Seat Cordoba
1998 - 1999
Volkswagen Polo
1994 - 1995
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP75 HP
Torque: 140 NM128 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds12.5 seconds
Seat Cordoba is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 25 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.97.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km7.7 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
530 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m3.72 m
Width: 1.64 m1.66 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Seat Cordoba is 42 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data975 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 800no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 800800
Pros and Cons: Seat Cordoba has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv