Seat Cordoba 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Seat Cordoba and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Seat Cordoba torque is 7 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Cordoba is 42 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 975 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |