Seat Cordoba 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 1995
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
| Seat Cordoba and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
| By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Cordoba is 42 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 975 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 700 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |