Seat Cordoba 1994 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 113 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 137 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Seat Cordoba engine produces 38 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
590 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.11 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 17 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 940 | 1`005 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |