Seat Cordoba 1994 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994

 
Seat Cordoba
1994 - 1996
Mitsubishi Lancer
1994 - 1996
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP113 HP
Torque: 125 NM137 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds9.8 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Cordoba engine produces 38 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Seat Cordoba reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.67.2
Real fuel consumption: 7.9 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Seat Cordoba consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Cordoba could require 60 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Cordoba consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
590 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.11 m4.28 m
Width: 1.64 m1.68 m
Height: 1.41 m1.38 m
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher.
Seat Cordoba is 17 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer.
Gross weight (kg): 9401`005
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Lancer has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv