Seat Cordoba 1999 vs BMW Z3 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seat Cordoba is available only with manual gearbox, whereas BMW Z3 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Seat Cordoba is available with front wheel drive, while BMW Z3 can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | 2.8 - 3.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 156 HP | 193 - 321 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 235 NM | 280 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 11 seconds | 5.4 - 7.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.8 | 9.4 - 10.4 | |
|
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW Z3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.31 m | |
| Seat Cordoba is 14 cm longer than the BMW Z3, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.9 metres more than that of the BMW Z3, which means Seat Cordoba can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
BMW Z3 has
| |