Seat Cordoba 1999 vs Volkswagen Polo 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 60 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 235 NM | 116 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 17.2 seconds | 11.1 - 17.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 8.4 | 5.2 - 8.6 | |
|
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Seat Cordoba equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Seat Cordoba is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Cordoba is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 925 | ~ 1`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Cordoba has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |