Seat Cordoba 1994 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 129 HP | 68 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 - 166 NM | 108 - 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 16.5 seconds | 7.6 - 16.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.5 | 6.1 - 7.9 | |
|
Seat Cordoba petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. On average, Seat Cordoba equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Seat Cordoba is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Cordoba is 17 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Cordoba is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Cordoba is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`010 | ~ 1`019 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |