Seat Ateca 2016 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Seat Ateca engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Seat Ateca reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ateca consumes 6.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Seat Ateca over 15,000 km in a year you can save 915 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ateca consumes 5.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Seat Ateca is smaller. Seat Ateca is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ateca is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |