Seat Arosa 1997 vs Suzuki Alto 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 73 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.4 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Alto is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arosa engine produces 4 HP less power than Suzuki Alto, but torque is 13 NM more than Suzuki Alto. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.4 | |
|
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Arosa consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arosa could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Suzuki Alto gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.50 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Seat Arosa is larger. Seat Arosa is 4 cm longer than the Suzuki Alto, 14 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arosa is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 8.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`360 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |