Seat Arosa 2001 vs Renault Clio 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Seat Arosa is more dynamic to drive. Seat Arosa engine produces 10 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 1080 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Arosa is 26 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Arosa is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 380 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Seat Arosa has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Arosa, so Seat Arosa quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Renault Clio has
| |