Seat Arosa 2001 vs Citroen C2 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Arosa is more dynamic to drive. Seat Arosa engine produces 25 HP more power than Citroen C2, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Citroen C2. Thanks to more power Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Arosa consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arosa could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Arosa consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Seat Arosa is smaller. Seat Arosa is 12 cm shorter than the Citroen C2, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 879 litres | |
|
Citroen C2 has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 63 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 89 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.5 metres more than that of the Citroen C2, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`410 | 1`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Citroen C2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Citroen C2, so Citroen C2 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |