Seat Arosa 2001 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arosa engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Lupo. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.5 | |
| Seat Arosa consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that by driving the Seat Arosa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 34 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 450 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km on highway | 580 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arosa is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`415 | 1`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |