Seat Arosa 2001 vs Renault Clio 2001

 
Seat Arosa
2001 - 2004
Renault Clio
2001 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP98 HP
Torque: 116 NM127 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.4 seconds12.9 seconds
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Arosa engine produces 38 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.47.3
Seat Arosa consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arosa could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 470 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
580 km on highway860 km on highway
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.55 m3.81 m
Width: 1.64 m1.64 m
Height: 1.46 m1.42 m
Seat Arosa is 26 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Arosa is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 130 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
790 litresno data
Renault Clio has more luggage space.
Seat Arosa has 380 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio.
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4151`475
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

low
Seat Arosa has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Arosa, so Seat Arosa quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12001000
Pros and Cons: Seat Arosa has
  • fewer faults
Renault Clio has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv