Seat Arosa 2001 vs Mini Cooper 2002

 
Seat Arosa
2001 - 2004
Mini Cooper
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP115 HP
Torque: 116 NM149 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.4 seconds10.4 seconds
Mini Cooper is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Arosa engine produces 55 HP less power than Mini Cooper, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Mini Cooper. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.46.7
The Mini Cooper is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Arosa consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arosa could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 470 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
Mini Cooper gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.55 m3.63 m
Width: 1.64 m1.69 m
Height: 1.46 m1.41 m
Seat Arosa is smaller, but higher.
Seat Arosa is 8 cm shorter than the Mini Cooper, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Arosa is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 130 litres160 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
790 litres670 litres
Seat Arosa has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mini Cooper. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arosa (by 120 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper, which means Seat Arosa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4151`480
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Seat Arosa has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mini Cooper has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Arosa, so Seat Arosa quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 12002400
Pros and Cons: Seat Arosa has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mini Cooper has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv