Seat Arosa 2001 vs Fiat Panda 2006

 
Seat Arosa
2001 - 2004
Fiat Panda
2006 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP100 HP
Torque: 116 NM131 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.4 seconds9.5 seconds
Fiat Panda is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Arosa engine produces 40 HP less power than Fiat Panda, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Fiat Panda. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.46.5
The Fiat Panda is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Arosa consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arosa could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 470 km in combined cycle530 km in combined cycle
Fiat Panda gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.55 m3.54 m
Width: 1.64 m1.58 m
Height: 1.46 m1.54 m
Seat Arosa is larger, but lower.
Seat Arosa is 1 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arosa is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 130 litres206 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
790 litresno data
Fiat Panda has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Seat Arosa has 76 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Panda. This could mean that the Seat Arosa uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters9.1 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 1 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`415no data
Safety: no data
Quality:Fiat Panda has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Fiat Panda, so Fiat Panda quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12002600
Pros and Cons: Seat Arosa has
  • lower price
Fiat Panda has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv