Seat Arosa 2001 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2001

 
Seat Arosa
2001 - 2004
Volkswagen Lupo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP60 HP
Torque: 116 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.2 seconds14.3 seconds
Seat Arosa and Volkswagen Lupo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.16.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km6.7 l/100km
By specification Seat Arosa consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that by driving the Seat Arosa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Arosa consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres34 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 570 km in combined cycle540 km in combined cycle
710 km on highway690 km on highway
530 km with real consumption500 km with real consumption
Seat Arosa gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.55 m3.53 m
Width: 1.64 m1.64 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arosa is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 130 litres130 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
790 litres830 litres
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`380
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Seat Arosa has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volkswagen Lupo has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv