Seat Arosa 2001 vs Renault Clio 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arosa engine produces 38 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arosa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Arosa consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Seat Arosa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Arosa consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Arosa is 26 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Arosa is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 380 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Seat Arosa has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Arosa, so Seat Arosa quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Renault Clio has
| |