Seat Arosa 2001 vs Citroen C2 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 118 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
Citroen C2 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arosa engine produces 15 HP less power than Citroen C2, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Citroen C2. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.1 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 41 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
710 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
530 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.55 m | 3.67 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Seat Arosa is smaller. Seat Arosa is 12 cm shorter than the Citroen C2, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 193 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 879 litres | |
Citroen C2 has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 63 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 89 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.5 metres more than that of the Citroen C2, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`365 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | Citroen C2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Citroen C2, so Citroen C2 quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |