Seat Arosa 2001 vs Fiat Panda 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 50 HP | 54 HP | |
Torque: | 86 NM | 88 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.7 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Fiat Panda is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arosa engine produces 4 HP less power than Fiat Panda, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Fiat Panda. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
By specification Seat Arosa consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arosa could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
540 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.55 m | 3.54 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.58 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
Seat Arosa is larger, but lower. Seat Arosa is 1 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arosa is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.7 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`360 | 800 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Seat Arosa has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Seat Arosa, so Seat Arosa quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Fiat Panda has
| |