Seat Arosa 2000 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 HP | 61 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
| Seat Arosa and Volkswagen Lupo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 34 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arosa is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Lupo, which means Seat Arosa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |