Seat Arosa 2000 vs Fiat Panda 2004

 
Seat Arosa
2000 - 2005
Fiat Panda
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.2 Diesel1.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 61 HP70 HP
Torque: 140 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.7 seconds13 seconds
Fiat Panda is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Arosa engine produces 9 HP less power than Fiat Panda, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Fiat Panda. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.04.3
The Seat Arosa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Arosa consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda, which means that by driving the Seat Arosa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1160 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
1290 km on highway940 km on highway
Seat Arosa gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.55 m3.54 m
Width: 1.64 m1.58 m
Height: 1.46 m1.54 m
Seat Arosa is larger, but lower.
Seat Arosa is 1 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arosa is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 130 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
790 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.1 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.7 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`200900
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Seat Arosa has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Seat Arosa, so Seat Arosa quality is probably better
Average price (€): 12002600
Pros and Cons: Seat Arosa has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Fiat Panda has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv