Seat Arosa 2000 vs Fiat Panda 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 61 HP | 70 HP | |
Torque: | 140 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 13 seconds | |
Fiat Panda is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arosa engine produces 9 HP less power than Fiat Panda, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Fiat Panda. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.0 | 4.3 | |
The Seat Arosa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Arosa consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda, which means that by driving the Seat Arosa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
1290 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Seat Arosa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.55 m | 3.54 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.58 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
Seat Arosa is larger, but lower. Seat Arosa is 1 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arosa is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.7 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 900 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Seat Arosa has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Seat Arosa, so Seat Arosa quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Fiat Panda has
| |