Seat Arosa 2000 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 | 1.0 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.7 seconds | 8.5 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.0 - 7.4 | 3.0 - 7.5 | |
|
Seat Arosa petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Lupo. On average, a Seat Arosa with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volkswagen Lupo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arosa is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 860 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`381 | ~ 1`368 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |