Seat Arosa 2000 vs Renault Clio 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 93 - 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.7 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.0 - 7.4 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Seat Arosa petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Seat Arosa equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Arosa is 26 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Arosa is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 380 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Seat Arosa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`381 | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Renault Clio has
| |