Seat Arosa 2000 vs Hyundai Atos 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 58 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 84 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.7 seconds | 15.1 - 19.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.0 - 7.4 | 6.1 - 6.8 | |
|
On average, the Seat Arosa petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Hyundai Atos. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.50 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Seat Arosa is larger, but lower. Seat Arosa is 5 cm longer than the Hyundai Atos, 14 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arosa is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 1084 litres | |
|
Hyundai Atos has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Arosa has 133 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Atos. This could mean that the Seat Arosa uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Atos (by 294 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Atos. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`381 | ~ 1`316 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Hyundai Atos has
| |