Seat Arosa 2000 vs Citroen C2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 61 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 94 - 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.7 seconds | 8.9 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.0 - 7.4 | 4.1 - 6.9 | |
|
Seat Arosa petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C2. On average, Seat Arosa equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Seat Arosa is smaller. Seat Arosa is 12 cm shorter than the Citroen C2, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 879 litres | |
|
Citroen C2 has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 63 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 89 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 1.1 metres less than that of the Citroen C2, which means Seat Arosa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`381 | ~ 1`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |