Seat Alhambra 1998 vs Mercedes Vito 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.1 seconds | 18.1 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 12 HP more power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mercedes Vito. Despite the higher power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.8 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is smaller. Seat Alhambra is 4 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes Vito, which means Seat Alhambra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |