Seat Alhambra 1997 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000

 
Seat Alhambra
1997 - 2000
Citroen Xsara Picasso
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP90 HP
Torque: 235 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.4 seconds14.5 seconds
Seat Alhambra engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Despite the higher power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.45.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1090 km in combined cycle1090 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1300 km on highway
1120 km with real consumption1000 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.28 m
Width: 1.81 m1.75 m
Height: 1.73 m1.64 m
Seat Alhambra is larger.
Seat Alhambra is 34 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data550 litres
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 1600800
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • more power
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv