Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Toyota Hiace 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 331 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 40 HP less power than Toyota Hiace, whereas torque is 129 NM less than Toyota Hiace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Alhambra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Toyota Hiace) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.95 m | |
| Seat Alhambra is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota Hiace, 12 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Toyota Hiace has
| |