Seat Alhambra 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

 
Seat Alhambra
2004 - 2010
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.8 Petrol2.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 204 HP204 HP
Torque: 265 NM265 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds10.3 seconds
Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.011.2
Seat Alhambra consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway780 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.76 m1.73 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

low
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better
Average price (€): 26002600
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv