Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Ford Galaxy 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 43 HP more power than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| 560 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Alhambra is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Ford Galaxy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 305 percent more cases than Ford Galaxy, so Ford Galaxy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |