Seat Alhambra 2005 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2005

 
Seat Alhambra
2005 - 2010
Volkswagen Sharan
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP140 HP
Torque: 310 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds12.8 seconds
Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.2
Real fuel consumption: 7.5 l/100km7.6 l/100km
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 75 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1040 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
930 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.76 m1.73 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 256 litres256 litres
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

low
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better
Average price (€): 26002600
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv