Seat Alhambra 2003 vs Ford Galaxy 2006

 
Seat Alhambra
2003 - 2005
Ford Galaxy
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP140 HP
Torque: 310 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds10.5 seconds
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Alhambra engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.26.5
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km7.2 l/100km
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
940 km with real consumption970 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.82 m
Width: 1.81 m1.85 m
Height: 1.74 m1.72 m
Seat Alhambra is smaller, but slightly higher.
Seat Alhambra is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 256 litres308 litres
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space.
Seat Alhambra has 52 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy.
Turning diameter: 11.9 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`700
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
Ford Galaxy has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 305 percent more cases than Ford Galaxy, so Ford Galaxy quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 26004200
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • lower price
Ford Galaxy has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv