Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997

 
Seat Alhambra
2000 - 2004
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP90 HP
Torque: 310 NM202 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds19.3 seconds
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Alhambra engine produces 25 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 108 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.36.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km6.9 l/100km
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
970 km with real consumption1080 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.62 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.76 m1.73 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 256 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Alhambra, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 26001000
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv