Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Mercedes Vito 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 122 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 7 HP less power than Mercedes Vito, but torque is 10 NM more than Mercedes Vito. Despite less power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 8.0 | |
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
Seat Alhambra is smaller. Seat Alhambra is 3 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes Vito, which means Seat Alhambra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |