Seat Alhambra 2004 vs Ford S-Max 2006

 
Seat Alhambra
2004 - 2010
Ford S-Max
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP145 HP
Torque: 210 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds10.9 seconds
Seat Alhambra engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford S-Max. Despite the higher power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.28.1
The Ford S-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Alhambra consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 315 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.77 m
Width: 1.81 m1.85 m
Height: 1.76 m1.66 m
Seat Alhambra is smaller, but higher.
Seat Alhambra is 14 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 10 cm higher.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: 256 litres854 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data854 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 256 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2100 litres
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford S-Max.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9002`340
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Ford S-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 26003800
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • lower price
Ford S-Max has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv