Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Despite the higher power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.2 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Alhambra is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 308 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Seat Alhambra has 52 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Ford Galaxy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 305 percent more cases than Ford Galaxy, so Ford Galaxy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |