Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Ford S-Max 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Seat Alhambra
2000 - 2010
Ford S-Max
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Seat Alhambra is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford S-Max can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.81.8 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 115 - 204 HP100 - 220 HP
Torque: 170 - 310 NM190 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 - 17.2 seconds7.9 - 11.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.2 - 11.96.2 - 9.7
Seat Alhambra petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max. On average, a Seat Alhambra with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford S-Max.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.77 m
Width: 1.81 m1.85 m
Height: 1.76 m1.66 m
Seat Alhambra is smaller, but higher.
Seat Alhambra is 14 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 256 litres854 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2100 litres
Ford S-Max has more luggage space.
Seat Alhambra has 598 litres less trunk space than the Ford S-Max.
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford S-Max.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`956~ 2`433
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Average price (€): 26004000
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Ford S-Max has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv