Saab 9-7X 2005 vs Volvo XC90 2006

 
Saab 9-7X
2005 - 2008
Volvo XC90
2006 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.2 Petrol3.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 290 HP238 HP
Torque: 373 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds9.5 seconds
Saab 9-7X is more dynamic to drive.
Saab 9-7X engine produces 52 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Saab 9-7X reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.511.8
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Saab 9-7X consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Saab 9-7X could require 255 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 83 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.81 m4.81 m
Width: 1.92 m1.90 m
Height: 1.74 m1.78 m
Saab 9-7X and Volvo XC90 are practically the same length.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: 1127 litres249 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data249 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 1127 litres613 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1837 litres
In 5-seat version Saab 9-7X has more luggage space (by 514 litres).
Turning diameter: no data12.5 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`5402`760
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 58009000
Pros and Cons: Saab 9-7X has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Volvo XC90 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv