Rover 45 1999 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is a more dynamic driving. Rover 45 engine produces 15 HP less power than Mitsubishi Carisma, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Mitsubishi Carisma. Due to the lower power, Rover 45 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Rover 45 is smaller. Rover 45 is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Carisma, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 45 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
717 litres | 1050 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has more luggage space. Rover 45 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Carisma (by 333 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`795 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |