Rover 45 1999 vs Honda Civic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 45 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 45 engine produces 5 HP less power than Honda Civic, but torque is 30 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite less power, Rover 45 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.3 | |
| Rover 45 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 45 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 45 is 4 cm longer than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
717 litres | 835 litres | |
| Rover 45 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Civic (by 118 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 45 has
|
| |